•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Original Study

Abstract

The struggle for survival and human dignity continues in Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine amid ongoing armed conflicts, while international organizations seek to uphold International Humanitarian Law (IHL). In many instances, the enforcement of humanitarian law falls short of established standards. Organizations such as the United Nations (UN), the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and the International Criminal Court (ICC) play vital roles in promoting and implementing humanitarian principles and protecting human rights. However, their effectiveness often depends on political cooperation and the existence of conditions conducive to peace. This study examines selected case studies to evaluate how political factors influence both the successes and limitations of these organizations in implementing IHL. The findings indicate that the international community has responded more extensively to developments in Ukraine than to conflicts in Syria and Yemen, highlighting disparities in international engagement and collective action. The study argues that addressing these inconsistencies is essential for improving humanitarian responses and strengthening the protection of civilians affected by armed conflict.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS