The court’s authority to review the judgment without the prescribed appeal methods Comparative study
Document Type
Original Study
Abstract
Judgments are not issued except after a short or long course of procedures carried out by the court and the litigants, and then it ends with a final ruling. The legislator obliged it. And if this is the original, then an exception to it is to give the court the authority to review the judgment by other than the established methods of appeal, in the event that there were written or arithmetic errors in the judgment that occurred as a result of the transfer from the pleading of the case, or from the minutes of the sessions, meaning that these errors have Its physical presence is in the case file, it did not come from outside it, and it does not change the nature of the judgment issued in it. The judgment in its judgment paragraph may be ambiguous or ambiguous, and in order for this ambiguity and ambiguity not to remain an obstacle to its implementation in the competent enforcement department, the legislator has permitted the just enforcer to request from the court that issued it to remove this ambiguity or ambiguity by explaining it and clarifying what is ambiguous in it provided that no This interpretation causes a change in the content of the judgment. And since the court is restricted by the requests contained in the petition, it must deal in its judgment with all these requests, whether it is a response or a response. Which issued the ruling to rule on what it overlooked, such as the Egyptian legislation, including what made this deficiency a reason for appealing discrimination, such as the Iraqi legislator. These three conditions will be the focus of our research
Recommended Citation
العجيلي, لفته هامل
(2021)
"The court’s authority to review the judgment without
the prescribed appeal methods
Comparative study,"
Imam Ja'afar Al-Sadiq University Journal of Legal Studies: Vol. 1:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
Available at:
https://ijsu.researchcommons.org/ijsu/vol1/iss1/4